Head-to-Head Analysis

Chunk Light Tuna in Water vs Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chunk Light Tuna in Water

Chunk Light Tuna in Water

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans

Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
98.6 kcal
Energy
137 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
2.6g
22.5g
Protein
28.1g
1g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chunk Light Tuna in Water and Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chunk Light Tuna in Water is the clear winner. With 38 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chunk Light Tuna in Water or Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans?

It depends on your goals. Chunk Light Tuna in Water has 98.6 calories, while Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans has 137 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chunk Light Tuna in Water vegan?

No, Chunk Light Tuna in Water is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chunk Light Tuna in Water and Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans?

There is a difference of 38 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.