Head-to-Head Analysis

Chunky blue cheese dressing, topping & spread vs Original buffalo wings sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chunky blue cheese dressing, topping & spread

Chunky blue cheese dressing, topping & spread

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original buffalo wings sauce

Original buffalo wings sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
0g
43.3g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
2.4g
Salt
7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chunky blue cheese dressing, topping & spread and Original buffalo wings sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chunky blue cheese dressing, topping & spread is the more energy-dense option here, packing 433 more calories per 100g than Original buffalo wings sauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chunky blue cheese dressing, topping & spread contains significantly more sugar (3.33g) compared to the milder Original buffalo wings sauce (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original buffalo wings sauce is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chunky blue cheese dressing, topping & spread or Original buffalo wings sauce?

It depends on your goals. Chunky blue cheese dressing, topping & spread has 433 calories, while Original buffalo wings sauce has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chunky blue cheese dressing, topping & spread vegan?

No, Chunky blue cheese dressing, topping & spread is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chunky blue cheese dressing, topping & spread and Original buffalo wings sauce?

There is a difference of 433 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.