Head-to-Head Analysis

Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo vs Wild Mackerel Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo

Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wild Mackerel Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil

Wild Mackerel Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
125 kcal
Energy
212 kcal
2.9g
Sugars
0g
2.9g
Fat
12.9g
5.8g
Protein
24.7g
0.9g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo and Wild Mackerel Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo is the clear winner. With 87 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo contains significantly more sugar (2.92g) compared to the milder Wild Mackerel Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wild Mackerel Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo or Wild Mackerel Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil?

It depends on your goals. Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo has 125 calories, while Wild Mackerel Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil has 212 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo vegan?

No, Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo and Wild Mackerel Fillets In Extra Virgin Olive Oil?

There is a difference of 87 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.