Head-to-Head Analysis

Cinnamon brown sugar vs Wheat Thins Ranch Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cinnamon brown sugar

Cinnamon brown sugar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wheat Thins Ranch Crackers

Wheat Thins Ranch Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
460 kcal
Energy
466.7 kcal
20g
Sugars
16.7g
16g
Fat
16.7g
8g
Protein
6.7g
1.1g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cinnamon brown sugar and Wheat Thins Ranch Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Cinnamon brown sugar is the clear winner. With 7 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cinnamon brown sugar contains significantly more sugar (20g) compared to the milder Wheat Thins Ranch Crackers (16.666666666667g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wheat Thins Ranch Crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cinnamon brown sugar or Wheat Thins Ranch Crackers?

It depends on your goals. Cinnamon brown sugar has 460 calories, while Wheat Thins Ranch Crackers has 466.66666666667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cinnamon brown sugar vegan?

No, Cinnamon brown sugar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cinnamon brown sugar and Wheat Thins Ranch Crackers?

There is a difference of 7 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.