Head-to-Head Analysis

Cinnamon Rolls with Icing vs 100% Premium Cranberry Juice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cinnamon Rolls with Icing

Cinnamon Rolls with Icing

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of 100% Premium Cranberry Juice

100% Premium Cranberry Juice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
318.2 kcal
Energy
41.7 kcal
22.7g
Sugars
10g
10.2g
Fat
0g
4.5g
Protein
0g
1.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cinnamon Rolls with Icing and 100% Premium Cranberry Juice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cinnamon Rolls with Icing is the more energy-dense option here, packing 277 more calories per 100g than 100% Premium Cranberry Juice. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cinnamon Rolls with Icing contains significantly more sugar (22.7272727272727g) compared to the milder 100% Premium Cranberry Juice (10g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, 100% Premium Cranberry Juice is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Cinnamon Rolls with Icing offers a protein boost with 4.54545454545455g per 100g, outperforming 100% Premium Cranberry Juice in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cinnamon Rolls with Icing or 100% Premium Cranberry Juice?

It depends on your goals. Cinnamon Rolls with Icing has 318.181818181818 calories, while 100% Premium Cranberry Juice has 41.6667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cinnamon Rolls with Icing vegan?

No, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cinnamon Rolls with Icing and 100% Premium Cranberry Juice?

There is a difference of 277 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.