Head-to-Head Analysis

Cinnamon Sugar Cookie vs Old fashioned whole grain oats cereal

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cinnamon Sugar Cookie

Cinnamon Sugar Cookie

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Old fashioned whole grain oats cereal

Old fashioned whole grain oats cereal

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
545 kcal
Energy
375 kcal
3g
Sugars
0g
42.4g
Fat
6.3g
21.2g
Protein
12.5g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cinnamon Sugar Cookie and Old fashioned whole grain oats cereal side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cinnamon Sugar Cookie is the more energy-dense option here, packing 170 more calories per 100g than Old fashioned whole grain oats cereal. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cinnamon Sugar Cookie contains significantly more sugar (3.03g) compared to the milder Old fashioned whole grain oats cereal (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Old fashioned whole grain oats cereal is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Cinnamon Sugar Cookie offers a protein boost with 21.2g per 100g, outperforming Old fashioned whole grain oats cereal in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cinnamon Sugar Cookie or Old fashioned whole grain oats cereal?

It depends on your goals. Cinnamon Sugar Cookie has 545 calories, while Old fashioned whole grain oats cereal has 375 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cinnamon Sugar Cookie vegan?

No, Cinnamon Sugar Cookie is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cinnamon Sugar Cookie and Old fashioned whole grain oats cereal?

There is a difference of 170 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.