Head-to-Head Analysis

Clams vs Cole's smoked rainbow trout in olive oil

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Clams

Clams

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cole's smoked rainbow trout in olive oil

Cole's smoked rainbow trout in olive oil

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
76.9 kcal
Energy
240 kcal
1.5g
Sugars
0g
7.7g
Fat
17.8g
12.3g
Protein
19.7g
0.9g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Clams and Cole's smoked rainbow trout in olive oil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Clams is the clear winner. With 163 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Clams contains significantly more sugar (1.5384615384615g) compared to the milder Cole's smoked rainbow trout in olive oil (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cole's smoked rainbow trout in olive oil is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Clams or Cole's smoked rainbow trout in olive oil?

It depends on your goals. Clams has 76.923076923077 calories, while Cole's smoked rainbow trout in olive oil has 240 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Clams vegan?

No, Clams is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Clams and Cole's smoked rainbow trout in olive oil?

There is a difference of 163 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.