Head-to-Head Analysis

Classic vs Niko niko calrose rice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Classic

Classic

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Niko niko calrose rice

Niko niko calrose rice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
565 kcal
Energy
359 kcal
2.4g
Sugars
0g
35.3g
Fat
0.6g
7.1g
Protein
6.5g
1.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Classic and Niko niko calrose rice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Classic is the more energy-dense option here, packing 206 more calories per 100g than Niko niko calrose rice. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Classic contains significantly more sugar (2.35g) compared to the milder Niko niko calrose rice (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Niko niko calrose rice is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Classic or Niko niko calrose rice?

It depends on your goals. Classic has 565 calories, while Niko niko calrose rice has 359 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Classic vegan?

No, Classic is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Classic and Niko niko calrose rice?

There is a difference of 206 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.