Head-to-Head Analysis

Classic Alfredo Pasta vs Himalayan Pink Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Classic Alfredo Pasta

Classic Alfredo Pasta

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Himalayan Pink Salt

Himalayan Pink Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
81 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
1.6g
Sugars
0g
5.7g
Fat
0g
1.6g
Protein
0g
1.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Classic Alfredo Pasta and Himalayan Pink Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Classic Alfredo Pasta is the more energy-dense option here, packing 81 more calories per 100g than Himalayan Pink Salt. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Classic Alfredo Pasta contains significantly more sugar (1.61g) compared to the milder Himalayan Pink Salt (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Himalayan Pink Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Classic Alfredo Pasta or Himalayan Pink Salt?

It depends on your goals. Classic Alfredo Pasta has 81 calories, while Himalayan Pink Salt has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Classic Alfredo Pasta vegan?

No, Classic Alfredo Pasta is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Classic Alfredo Pasta and Himalayan Pink Salt?

There is a difference of 81 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.