Head-to-Head Analysis

Classic Beef Stick vs Toblerone Dark Chocolate with Honey & Almond Nougat

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Classic Beef Stick

Classic Beef Stick

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Toblerone Dark Chocolate with Honey & Almond Nougat

Toblerone Dark Chocolate with Honey & Almond Nougat

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
1150 kcal
Energy
516 kcal
0g
Sugars
47g
76.5g
Fat
30g
102g
Protein
5.9g
11.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Classic Beef Stick and Toblerone Dark Chocolate with Honey & Almond Nougat side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Classic Beef Stick is the more energy-dense option here, packing 634 more calories per 100g than Toblerone Dark Chocolate with Honey & Almond Nougat. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Classic Beef Stick takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Toblerone Dark Chocolate with Honey & Almond Nougat contains 47g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Classic Beef Stick offers a protein boost with 102g per 100g, outperforming Toblerone Dark Chocolate with Honey & Almond Nougat in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Classic Beef Stick or Toblerone Dark Chocolate with Honey & Almond Nougat?

It depends on your goals. Classic Beef Stick has 1150 calories, while Toblerone Dark Chocolate with Honey & Almond Nougat has 516 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Classic Beef Stick vegan?

No, Classic Beef Stick is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Classic Beef Stick and Toblerone Dark Chocolate with Honey & Almond Nougat?

There is a difference of 634 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.