Head-to-Head Analysis

Classic Cinnamon Oatmeal vs Organic Unsweetened Soymilk Plain

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Classic Cinnamon Oatmeal

Classic Cinnamon Oatmeal

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Unsweetened Soymilk Plain

Organic Unsweetened Soymilk Plain

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
372 kcal
Energy
41.7 kcal
18.6g
Sugars
0.4g
7g
Fat
1.9g
16.3g
Protein
3.8g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Classic Cinnamon Oatmeal and Organic Unsweetened Soymilk Plain side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Classic Cinnamon Oatmeal is the more energy-dense option here, packing 330 more calories per 100g than Organic Unsweetened Soymilk Plain. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Classic Cinnamon Oatmeal contains significantly more sugar (18.6g) compared to the milder Organic Unsweetened Soymilk Plain (0.417g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Unsweetened Soymilk Plain is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Classic Cinnamon Oatmeal offers a protein boost with 16.3g per 100g, outperforming Organic Unsweetened Soymilk Plain in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Classic Cinnamon Oatmeal or Organic Unsweetened Soymilk Plain?

It depends on your goals. Classic Cinnamon Oatmeal has 372 calories, while Organic Unsweetened Soymilk Plain has 41.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Classic Cinnamon Oatmeal vegan?

No, Classic Cinnamon Oatmeal is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Classic Cinnamon Oatmeal and Organic Unsweetened Soymilk Plain?

There is a difference of 330 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.