Head-to-Head Analysis

Classic Malt vs Double Espresso

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Classic Malt

Classic Malt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Double Espresso

Double Espresso

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
377 kcal
Energy
45 kcal
46g
Sugars
6.1g
2g
Fat
0.7g
11g
Protein
2.7g
1g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Classic Malt and Double Espresso side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Classic Malt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 332 more calories per 100g than Double Espresso. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Classic Malt contains significantly more sugar (46g) compared to the milder Double Espresso (6.08g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Double Espresso is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Classic Malt offers a protein boost with 11g per 100g, outperforming Double Espresso in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Classic Malt or Double Espresso?

It depends on your goals. Classic Malt has 377 calories, while Double Espresso has 45 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Classic Malt vegan?

No, Classic Malt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Classic Malt and Double Espresso?

There is a difference of 332 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.