Classic Malt vs Throat Coat
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Classic Malt
Throat Coat
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Classic Malt and Throat Coat side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Classic Malt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 377 more calories per 100g than Throat Coat. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Classic Malt contains significantly more sugar (46g) compared to the milder Throat Coat (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Throat Coat is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Classic Malt offers a protein boost with 11g per 100g, outperforming Throat Coat in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Classic Malt or Throat Coat?
It depends on your goals. Classic Malt has 377 calories, while Throat Coat has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Classic Malt vegan?
No, Classic Malt is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Classic Malt and Throat Coat?
There is a difference of 377 calories per 100g between the two products.
