Head-to-Head Analysis

Classic recipe oat milk chocolate vs Jalapeno Kettle cooked potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Classic recipe oat milk chocolate

Classic recipe oat milk chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Jalapeno Kettle cooked potato chips

Jalapeno Kettle cooked potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
566.7 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
43.3g
Sugars
3.6g
33.3g
Fat
28.6g
3.3g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Classic recipe oat milk chocolate and Jalapeno Kettle cooked potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Classic recipe oat milk chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 31 more calories per 100g than Jalapeno Kettle cooked potato chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Classic recipe oat milk chocolate contains significantly more sugar (43.333333333333g) compared to the milder Jalapeno Kettle cooked potato chips (3.5714g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Jalapeno Kettle cooked potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Classic recipe oat milk chocolate or Jalapeno Kettle cooked potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Classic recipe oat milk chocolate has 566.66666666667 calories, while Jalapeno Kettle cooked potato chips has 535.7143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Classic recipe oat milk chocolate vegan?

No, Classic recipe oat milk chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Classic recipe oat milk chocolate and Jalapeno Kettle cooked potato chips?

There is a difference of 31 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.