Head-to-Head Analysis

Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips vs Coconut water original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips

Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Coconut water original

Coconut water original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
541 kcal
Energy
16.7 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.1g
30.6g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
0g
1.1g
Salt
90.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips and Coconut water original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 524 more calories per 100g than Coconut water original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Coconut water original contains 3.06g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips offers a protein boost with 7.06g per 100g, outperforming Coconut water original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips or Coconut water original?

It depends on your goals. Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips has 541 calories, while Coconut water original has 16.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips vegan?

No, Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Classic Sea Salt Kettle Style Potato Chips and Coconut water original?

There is a difference of 524 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.