Head-to-Head Analysis

Classic Smoked Plant-Based Frankfurters vs Spicy Black Bean Burgers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Classic Smoked Plant-Based Frankfurters

Classic Smoked Plant-Based Frankfurters

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Spicy Black Bean Burgers

Spicy Black Bean Burgers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
235 kcal
Energy
179 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
3g
9.4g
Fat
6.7g
25.9g
Protein
13.4g
2g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Classic Smoked Plant-Based Frankfurters and Spicy Black Bean Burgers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Classic Smoked Plant-Based Frankfurters is the more energy-dense option here, packing 56 more calories per 100g than Spicy Black Bean Burgers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Classic Smoked Plant-Based Frankfurters takes the lead with only 1.18g of sugar per 100g, whereas Spicy Black Bean Burgers contains 2.99g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Classic Smoked Plant-Based Frankfurters offers a protein boost with 25.9g per 100g, outperforming Spicy Black Bean Burgers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Classic Smoked Plant-Based Frankfurters or Spicy Black Bean Burgers?

It depends on your goals. Classic Smoked Plant-Based Frankfurters has 235 calories, while Spicy Black Bean Burgers has 179 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Classic Smoked Plant-Based Frankfurters vegan?

No, Classic Smoked Plant-Based Frankfurters is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Classic Smoked Plant-Based Frankfurters and Spicy Black Bean Burgers?

There is a difference of 56 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.