Head-to-Head Analysis

Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter vs Beet puffs, beet

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter

Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Beet puffs, beet

Beet puffs, beet

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
576 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
12.1g
Sugars
3.6g
39.4g
Fat
25g
21.2g
Protein
10.7g
0.1g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter and Beet puffs, beet side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter is the more energy-dense option here, packing 76 more calories per 100g than Beet puffs, beet. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter contains significantly more sugar (12.1g) compared to the milder Beet puffs, beet (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Beet puffs, beet is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter offers a protein boost with 21.2g per 100g, outperforming Beet puffs, beet in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter or Beet puffs, beet?

It depends on your goals. Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter has 576 calories, while Beet puffs, beet has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter vegan?

No, Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter and Beet puffs, beet?

There is a difference of 76 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.