Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter vs Sweet Fish
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter
Sweet Fish
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter and Sweet Fish side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter is the more energy-dense option here, packing 316 more calories per 100g than Sweet Fish. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter contains significantly more sugar (12.1g) compared to the milder Sweet Fish (6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet Fish is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter offers a protein boost with 21.2g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Fish in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter or Sweet Fish?
It depends on your goals. Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter has 576 calories, while Sweet Fish has 260 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter vegan?
No, Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Classic Wisconsin Custard Cashew Butter and Sweet Fish?
There is a difference of 316 calories per 100g between the two products.
