Head-to-Head Analysis

Clif builder's chocolate protein bars vs Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Clif builder's chocolate protein bars

Clif builder's chocolate protein bars

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo

Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
411.8 kcal
Energy
517 kcal
25g
Sugars
41.4g
13.2g
Fat
24.1g
29.4g
Protein
3.5g
0.8g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Clif builder's chocolate protein bars and Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Clif builder's chocolate protein bars is the clear winner. With 105 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Clif builder's chocolate protein bars takes the lead with only 25g of sugar per 100g, whereas Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo contains 41.38g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Clif builder's chocolate protein bars offers a protein boost with 29.41g per 100g, outperforming Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Clif builder's chocolate protein bars or Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo?

Clif builder's chocolate protein bars appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Clif builder's chocolate protein bars vegan?

No, Clif builder's chocolate protein bars is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Clif builder's chocolate protein bars and Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo?

There is a difference of 105 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.