Head-to-Head Analysis

Clif chocolate brownie z bars vs Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Clif chocolate brownie z bars

Clif chocolate brownie z bars

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great

Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
361.1 kcal
Energy
280 kcal
30.6g
Sugars
20g
8.3g
Fat
8g
5.6g
Protein
32g
1g
Salt
4.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Clif chocolate brownie z bars and Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Clif chocolate brownie z bars is the more energy-dense option here, packing 81 more calories per 100g than Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Clif chocolate brownie z bars contains significantly more sugar (30.56g) compared to the milder Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great (20g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Clif chocolate brownie z bars or Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great?

It depends on your goals. Clif chocolate brownie z bars has 361.11 calories, while Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great has 280 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Clif chocolate brownie z bars vegan?

No, Clif chocolate brownie z bars is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Clif chocolate brownie z bars and Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great?

There is a difference of 81 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.