Clif Kid ZBar Chocolate Chip vs Sour Gummi Candy Trees
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Clif Kid ZBar Chocolate Chip
Sour Gummi Candy Trees
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Clif Kid ZBar Chocolate Chip and Sour Gummi Candy Trees side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Clif Kid ZBar Chocolate Chip is the more energy-dense option here, packing 66 more calories per 100g than Sour Gummi Candy Trees. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Clif Kid ZBar Chocolate Chip takes the lead with only 27.8g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sour Gummi Candy Trees contains 45.16g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Clif Kid ZBar Chocolate Chip offers a protein boost with 5.56g per 100g, outperforming Sour Gummi Candy Trees in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Clif Kid ZBar Chocolate Chip or Sour Gummi Candy Trees?
It depends on your goals. Clif Kid ZBar Chocolate Chip has 389 calories, while Sour Gummi Candy Trees has 322.58 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Clif Kid ZBar Chocolate Chip vegan?
No, Clif Kid ZBar Chocolate Chip is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Clif Kid ZBar Chocolate Chip and Sour Gummi Candy Trees?
There is a difference of 66 calories per 100g between the two products.
