Head-to-Head Analysis

Cocoa Baton Wafer Cookies vs Extra toasty baked naturally flavored cheese crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cocoa Baton Wafer Cookies

Cocoa Baton Wafer Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Extra toasty baked naturally flavored cheese crackers

Extra toasty baked naturally flavored cheese crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
458.3 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
41.7g
Sugars
3.3g
20.8g
Fat
26.7g
4.2g
Protein
6.7g
0.2g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cocoa Baton Wafer Cookies and Extra toasty baked naturally flavored cheese crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Cocoa Baton Wafer Cookies is the clear winner. With 42 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cocoa Baton Wafer Cookies contains significantly more sugar (41.66667g) compared to the milder Extra toasty baked naturally flavored cheese crackers (3.3333g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Extra toasty baked naturally flavored cheese crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cocoa Baton Wafer Cookies or Extra toasty baked naturally flavored cheese crackers?

It depends on your goals. Cocoa Baton Wafer Cookies has 458.33333 calories, while Extra toasty baked naturally flavored cheese crackers has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cocoa Baton Wafer Cookies vegan?

No, Cocoa Baton Wafer Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cocoa Baton Wafer Cookies and Extra toasty baked naturally flavored cheese crackers?

There is a difference of 42 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.