Head-to-Head Analysis

Coconut cashew crisps vs Classic Original Water Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Coconut cashew crisps

Coconut cashew crisps

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Classic Original Water Crackers

Classic Original Water Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
586.2 kcal
Energy
467 kcal
20.7g
Sugars
0g
48.3g
Fat
10g
10.3g
Protein
6.7g
0.7g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Coconut cashew crisps and Classic Original Water Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Coconut cashew crisps is the more energy-dense option here, packing 119 more calories per 100g than Classic Original Water Crackers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Coconut cashew crisps contains significantly more sugar (20.6897g) compared to the milder Classic Original Water Crackers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Classic Original Water Crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Coconut cashew crisps offers a protein boost with 10.3448g per 100g, outperforming Classic Original Water Crackers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Coconut cashew crisps or Classic Original Water Crackers?

It depends on your goals. Coconut cashew crisps has 586.2069 calories, while Classic Original Water Crackers has 467 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Coconut cashew crisps vegan?

No, Coconut cashew crisps is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Coconut cashew crisps and Classic Original Water Crackers?

There is a difference of 119 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.