Head-to-Head Analysis

Coconut cashew crisps vs Extra-Large Black Ripe Pitted Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Coconut cashew crisps

Coconut cashew crisps

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Extra-Large Black Ripe Pitted Olives

Extra-Large Black Ripe Pitted Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
586 kcal
Energy
25.1 kcal
20.7g
Sugars
0g
41.4g
Fat
2.5g
9g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Coconut cashew crisps and Extra-Large Black Ripe Pitted Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Coconut cashew crisps is the more energy-dense option here, packing 561 more calories per 100g than Extra-Large Black Ripe Pitted Olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Coconut cashew crisps contains significantly more sugar (20.7g) compared to the milder Extra-Large Black Ripe Pitted Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Extra-Large Black Ripe Pitted Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Coconut cashew crisps offers a protein boost with 8.97g per 100g, outperforming Extra-Large Black Ripe Pitted Olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Coconut cashew crisps or Extra-Large Black Ripe Pitted Olives?

It depends on your goals. Coconut cashew crisps has 586 calories, while Extra-Large Black Ripe Pitted Olives has 25.1 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Coconut cashew crisps vegan?

No, Coconut cashew crisps is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Coconut cashew crisps and Extra-Large Black Ripe Pitted Olives?

There is a difference of 561 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.