Coconut Clusters With Super Seeds, Super Seeds vs Fit&active lightly salted rice cakes
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Coconut Clusters With Super Seeds, Super Seeds

Fit&active lightly salted rice cakes
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Coconut Clusters With Super Seeds, Super Seeds and Fit&active lightly salted rice cakes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Coconut Clusters With Super Seeds, Super Seeds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 136 more calories per 100g than Fit&active lightly salted rice cakes. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Coconut Clusters With Super Seeds, Super Seeds contains significantly more sugar (25g) compared to the milder Fit&active lightly salted rice cakes (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Fit&active lightly salted rice cakes is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Coconut Clusters With Super Seeds, Super Seeds offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Fit&active lightly salted rice cakes in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Coconut Clusters With Super Seeds, Super Seeds or Fit&active lightly salted rice cakes?
It depends on your goals. Coconut Clusters With Super Seeds, Super Seeds has 536 calories, while Fit&active lightly salted rice cakes has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Coconut Clusters With Super Seeds, Super Seeds vegan?
No, Coconut Clusters With Super Seeds, Super Seeds is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Coconut Clusters With Super Seeds, Super Seeds and Fit&active lightly salted rice cakes?
There is a difference of 136 calories per 100g between the two products.




