Head-to-Head Analysis

Coconut Mango Cream Protein vs Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Coconut Mango Cream Protein

Coconut Mango Cream Protein

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt

Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
374 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
5.7g
Sugars
0g
2.9g
Fat
21.4g
74.3g
Protein
7.1g
0.5g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Coconut Mango Cream Protein and Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Coconut Mango Cream Protein is the clear winner. With 90 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Coconut Mango Cream Protein contains significantly more sugar (5.71g) compared to the milder Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Coconut Mango Cream Protein offers a protein boost with 74.3g per 100g, outperforming Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Coconut Mango Cream Protein or Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt?

It depends on your goals. Coconut Mango Cream Protein has 374 calories, while Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Coconut Mango Cream Protein vegan?

No, Coconut Mango Cream Protein is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Coconut Mango Cream Protein and Reduced Fat Potato Chips Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 90 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.