Head-to-Head Analysis

Coconut Ring Cookies vs milk chocolate with almonds

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Coconut Ring Cookies

Coconut Ring Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Package of milk chocolate with almonds

milk chocolate with almonds

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
455 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
30.3g
Sugars
50g
13.6g
Fat
33.3g
9.1g
Protein
10g
1.1g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Coconut Ring Cookies and milk chocolate with almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Coconut Ring Cookies is the clear winner. With 45 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Coconut Ring Cookies takes the lead with only 30.3g of sugar per 100g, whereas milk chocolate with almonds contains 50g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Coconut Ring Cookies or milk chocolate with almonds?

Coconut Ring Cookies appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Coconut Ring Cookies vegan?

No, Coconut Ring Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Coconut Ring Cookies and milk chocolate with almonds?

There is a difference of 45 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.