Coconut rolls with ube Flavor vs Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Coconut rolls with ube Flavor
Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Coconut rolls with ube Flavor and Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Coconut rolls with ube Flavor is the clear winner. With 67 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Coconut rolls with ube Flavor contains significantly more sugar (28.1g) compared to the milder Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips (3.5714285714286g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Coconut rolls with ube Flavor or Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips?
It depends on your goals. Coconut rolls with ube Flavor has 469 calories, while Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Coconut rolls with ube Flavor vegan?
No, Coconut rolls with ube Flavor is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Coconut rolls with ube Flavor and Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips?
There is a difference of 67 calories per 100g between the two products.
