Coconut Water With Pulp vs Furmano's chick peas in brine
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Coconut Water With Pulp
Furmano's chick peas in brine
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Coconut Water With Pulp and Furmano's chick peas in brine side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Coconut Water With Pulp is the clear winner. With 72 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Coconut Water With Pulp contains significantly more sugar (3.33g) compared to the milder Furmano's chick peas in brine (2.3076923076923g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Furmano's chick peas in brine is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Coconut Water With Pulp or Furmano's chick peas in brine?
It depends on your goals. Coconut Water With Pulp has 20.8 calories, while Furmano's chick peas in brine has 92.307692307692 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Coconut Water With Pulp vegan?
No, Coconut Water With Pulp is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Coconut Water With Pulp and Furmano's chick peas in brine?
There is a difference of 72 calories per 100g between the two products.
