Head-to-Head Analysis

Collagen + beauty Blend Strawberry Colada vs California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Collagen + beauty Blend Strawberry Colada

Collagen + beauty Blend Strawberry Colada

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium

California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
362 kcal
Energy
133.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
10g
72.5g
Protein
0g
0.3g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Collagen + beauty Blend Strawberry Colada and California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Collagen + beauty Blend Strawberry Colada is the more energy-dense option here, packing 229 more calories per 100g than California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Collagen + beauty Blend Strawberry Colada offers a protein boost with 72.5g per 100g, outperforming California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Collagen + beauty Blend Strawberry Colada or California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium?

It depends on your goals. Collagen + beauty Blend Strawberry Colada has 362 calories, while California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium has 133.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Collagen + beauty Blend Strawberry Colada vegan?

No, Collagen + beauty Blend Strawberry Colada is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Collagen + beauty Blend Strawberry Colada and California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium?

There is a difference of 229 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.