Head-to-Head Analysis

Colorfuel Greens vs Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Colorfuel Greens

Colorfuel Greens

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy

Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
300 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
20g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Colorfuel Greens and Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Colorfuel Greens is the more energy-dense option here, packing 300 more calories per 100g than Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Colorfuel Greens contains significantly more sugar (20g) compared to the milder Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Colorfuel Greens or Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy?

It depends on your goals. Colorfuel Greens has 300 calories, while Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Colorfuel Greens vegan?

No, Colorfuel Greens is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Colorfuel Greens and Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy?

There is a difference of 300 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.