Head-to-Head Analysis

Cone Snack With Chocolate Flavored Filling vs Taboule Salad

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cone Snack With Chocolate Flavored Filling

Cone Snack With Chocolate Flavored Filling

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Taboule Salad

Taboule Salad

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
2100 kcal
Energy
170 kcal
137g
Sugars
2g
123g
Fat
13g
27.4g
Protein
2g
0g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cone Snack With Chocolate Flavored Filling and Taboule Salad side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cone Snack With Chocolate Flavored Filling is the more energy-dense option here, packing 1930 more calories per 100g than Taboule Salad. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cone Snack With Chocolate Flavored Filling contains significantly more sugar (137g) compared to the milder Taboule Salad (2g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Taboule Salad is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Cone Snack With Chocolate Flavored Filling offers a protein boost with 27.4g per 100g, outperforming Taboule Salad in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cone Snack With Chocolate Flavored Filling or Taboule Salad?

It depends on your goals. Cone Snack With Chocolate Flavored Filling has 2100 calories, while Taboule Salad has 170 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cone Snack With Chocolate Flavored Filling vegan?

No, Cone Snack With Chocolate Flavored Filling is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cone Snack With Chocolate Flavored Filling and Taboule Salad?

There is a difference of 1930 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.