Head-to-Head Analysis

conquistador vs Ruffels, Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of conquistador

conquistador

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Ruffels, Potato Chips

Ruffels, Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
498 kcal
Energy
565 kcal
35.2g
Sugars
3.5g
24.2g
Fat
35.3g
5g
Protein
7.1g
1.1g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing conquistador and Ruffels, Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, conquistador is the clear winner. With 67 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. conquistador contains significantly more sugar (35.2g) compared to the milder Ruffels, Potato Chips (3.53g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ruffels, Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: conquistador or Ruffels, Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. conquistador has 498 calories, while Ruffels, Potato Chips has 565 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is conquistador vegan?

No, conquistador is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between conquistador and Ruffels, Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 67 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.