Head-to-Head Analysis

constanzo vs Bhatha Kani

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of constanzo

constanzo

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Bhatha Kani

Bhatha Kani

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
530.6 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
39.9g
Sugars
0g
30.1g
Fat
24g
8.3g
Protein
16g
0.2g
Salt
2.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing constanzo and Bhatha Kani side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

constanzo is the more energy-dense option here, packing 31 more calories per 100g than Bhatha Kani. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. constanzo contains significantly more sugar (39.9g) compared to the milder Bhatha Kani (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Bhatha Kani is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: constanzo or Bhatha Kani?

It depends on your goals. constanzo has 530.6 calories, while Bhatha Kani has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is constanzo vegan?

No, constanzo is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between constanzo and Bhatha Kani?

There is a difference of 31 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.