Cooked Ham vs Grass fed beef franks
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Cooked Ham
Grass fed beef franks
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Cooked Ham and Grass fed beef franks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Cooked Ham is the more energy-dense option here, packing 93 more calories per 100g than Grass fed beef franks. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Cooked Ham contains significantly more sugar (1.85g) compared to the milder Grass fed beef franks (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Grass fed beef franks is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Cooked Ham offers a protein boost with 18.52g per 100g, outperforming Grass fed beef franks in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Cooked Ham or Grass fed beef franks?
It depends on your goals. Cooked Ham has 92.59 calories, while Grass fed beef franks has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Cooked Ham vegan?
No, Cooked Ham is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Cooked Ham and Grass fed beef franks?
There is a difference of 93 calories per 100g between the two products.
