Head-to-Head Analysis

Cookie Platter - White Macadamia Nut vs Botan rice candy

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cookie Platter - White Macadamia Nut

Cookie Platter - White Macadamia Nut

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Botan rice candy

Botan rice candy

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464 kcal
Energy
381 kcal
35.7g
Sugars
14.3g
25g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cookie Platter - White Macadamia Nut and Botan rice candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cookie Platter - White Macadamia Nut is the more energy-dense option here, packing 83 more calories per 100g than Botan rice candy. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cookie Platter - White Macadamia Nut contains significantly more sugar (35.7g) compared to the milder Botan rice candy (14.285714285714g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Botan rice candy is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Cookie Platter - White Macadamia Nut offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Botan rice candy in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cookie Platter - White Macadamia Nut or Botan rice candy?

It depends on your goals. Cookie Platter - White Macadamia Nut has 464 calories, while Botan rice candy has 380.95238095238 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cookie Platter - White Macadamia Nut vegan?

No, Cookie Platter - White Macadamia Nut is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cookie Platter - White Macadamia Nut and Botan rice candy?

There is a difference of 83 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.