Head-to-Head Analysis

Cookies and cream vs Shasta

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cookies and cream

Cookies and cream

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Shasta

Shasta

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
312 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
3.1g
Sugars
0g
4.7g
Fat
0g
62.5g
Protein
0g
1.3g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cookies and cream and Shasta side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cookies and cream is the more energy-dense option here, packing 312 more calories per 100g than Shasta. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cookies and cream contains significantly more sugar (3.12g) compared to the milder Shasta (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Shasta is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Cookies and cream offers a protein boost with 62.5g per 100g, outperforming Shasta in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cookies and cream or Shasta?

It depends on your goals. Cookies and cream has 312 calories, while Shasta has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cookies and cream vegan?

No, Cookies and cream is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cookies and cream and Shasta?

There is a difference of 312 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.