Head-to-Head Analysis

Cooking Sauce & Glaze Japanese BBQ vs Classic Yellow Mustard

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cooking Sauce & Glaze Japanese BBQ

Cooking Sauce & Glaze Japanese BBQ

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Classic Yellow Mustard

Classic Yellow Mustard

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
184 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
36.8g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
5.3g
Protein
0g
5.3g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cooking Sauce & Glaze Japanese BBQ and Classic Yellow Mustard side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cooking Sauce & Glaze Japanese BBQ is the more energy-dense option here, packing 184 more calories per 100g than Classic Yellow Mustard. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cooking Sauce & Glaze Japanese BBQ contains significantly more sugar (36.8g) compared to the milder Classic Yellow Mustard (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Classic Yellow Mustard is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Cooking Sauce & Glaze Japanese BBQ offers a protein boost with 5.26g per 100g, outperforming Classic Yellow Mustard in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cooking Sauce & Glaze Japanese BBQ or Classic Yellow Mustard?

It depends on your goals. Cooking Sauce & Glaze Japanese BBQ has 184 calories, while Classic Yellow Mustard has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cooking Sauce & Glaze Japanese BBQ vegan?

No, Cooking Sauce & Glaze Japanese BBQ is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cooking Sauce & Glaze Japanese BBQ and Classic Yellow Mustard?

There is a difference of 184 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.