Head-to-Head Analysis

Cool Mint Chocolate Energy Bars vs Jumbo Pitted Black Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cool Mint Chocolate Energy Bars

Cool Mint Chocolate Energy Bars

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Jumbo Pitted Black Olives

Jumbo Pitted Black Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
368 kcal
Energy
178.6 kcal
25g
Sugars
0g
8.8g
Fat
17.9g
14.7g
Protein
0g
0.5g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cool Mint Chocolate Energy Bars and Jumbo Pitted Black Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cool Mint Chocolate Energy Bars is the more energy-dense option here, packing 189 more calories per 100g than Jumbo Pitted Black Olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cool Mint Chocolate Energy Bars contains significantly more sugar (25g) compared to the milder Jumbo Pitted Black Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Jumbo Pitted Black Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Cool Mint Chocolate Energy Bars offers a protein boost with 14.7g per 100g, outperforming Jumbo Pitted Black Olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cool Mint Chocolate Energy Bars or Jumbo Pitted Black Olives?

It depends on your goals. Cool Mint Chocolate Energy Bars has 368 calories, while Jumbo Pitted Black Olives has 178.57142857143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cool Mint Chocolate Energy Bars vegan?

No, Cool Mint Chocolate Energy Bars is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cool Mint Chocolate Energy Bars and Jumbo Pitted Black Olives?

There is a difference of 189 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.