Head-to-Head Analysis

counts vs KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of counts

counts

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS

KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
485 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
54.5g
Sugars
0g
24.2g
Fat
32.1g
3g
Protein
7.1g
0.1g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing counts and KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, counts is the clear winner. With 51 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. counts contains significantly more sugar (54.5g) compared to the milder KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: counts or KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS?

It depends on your goals. counts has 485 calories, while KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is counts vegan?

No, counts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between counts and KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS?

There is a difference of 51 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.