Head-to-Head Analysis

Cowboy Smoked Beef Jurky vs Salted with sea salt pistachios

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cowboy Smoked Beef Jurky

Cowboy Smoked Beef Jurky

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Salted with sea salt pistachios

Salted with sea salt pistachios

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
170.1 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
2g
7.1g
Fat
14g
39.3g
Protein
6g
3.6g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cowboy Smoked Beef Jurky and Salted with sea salt pistachios side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cowboy Smoked Beef Jurky is the more energy-dense option here, packing 116 more calories per 100g than Salted with sea salt pistachios. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cowboy Smoked Beef Jurky contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Salted with sea salt pistachios (2g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Salted with sea salt pistachios is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Cowboy Smoked Beef Jurky offers a protein boost with 39.3g per 100g, outperforming Salted with sea salt pistachios in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cowboy Smoked Beef Jurky or Salted with sea salt pistachios?

It depends on your goals. Cowboy Smoked Beef Jurky has 286 calories, while Salted with sea salt pistachios has 170.1 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cowboy Smoked Beef Jurky vegan?

No, Cowboy Smoked Beef Jurky is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cowboy Smoked Beef Jurky and Salted with sea salt pistachios?

There is a difference of 116 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.