Head-to-Head Analysis

Cranberry Almond Chicken Salad vs Meal Replacement Shake

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cranberry Almond Chicken Salad

Cranberry Almond Chicken Salad

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Meal Replacement Shake

Meal Replacement Shake

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
324 kcal
Energy
58.5 kcal
9.3g
Sugars
5.8g
25.4g
Fat
1.8g
8.1g
Protein
3.1g
0.9g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cranberry Almond Chicken Salad and Meal Replacement Shake side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cranberry Almond Chicken Salad is the more energy-dense option here, packing 266 more calories per 100g than Meal Replacement Shake. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cranberry Almond Chicken Salad contains significantly more sugar (9.25g) compared to the milder Meal Replacement Shake (5.8461538461538g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Meal Replacement Shake is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Cranberry Almond Chicken Salad offers a protein boost with 8.09g per 100g, outperforming Meal Replacement Shake in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cranberry Almond Chicken Salad or Meal Replacement Shake?

It depends on your goals. Cranberry Almond Chicken Salad has 324 calories, while Meal Replacement Shake has 58.461538461538 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cranberry Almond Chicken Salad vegan?

No, Cranberry Almond Chicken Salad is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cranberry Almond Chicken Salad and Meal Replacement Shake?

There is a difference of 266 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.