Head-to-Head Analysis

Cranberry Cashew and Almond Trail Mix vs Original balance multigrain cereal

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cranberry Cashew and Almond Trail Mix

Cranberry Cashew and Almond Trail Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original balance multigrain cereal

Original balance multigrain cereal

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
381 kcal
43.3g
Sugars
19g
26.7g
Fat
4.8g
10g
Protein
9.5g
0.4g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cranberry Cashew and Almond Trail Mix and Original balance multigrain cereal side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cranberry Cashew and Almond Trail Mix is the more energy-dense option here, packing 119 more calories per 100g than Original balance multigrain cereal. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cranberry Cashew and Almond Trail Mix contains significantly more sugar (43.3g) compared to the milder Original balance multigrain cereal (19.0476g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original balance multigrain cereal is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cranberry Cashew and Almond Trail Mix or Original balance multigrain cereal?

It depends on your goals. Cranberry Cashew and Almond Trail Mix has 500 calories, while Original balance multigrain cereal has 380.9524 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cranberry Cashew and Almond Trail Mix vegan?

No, Cranberry Cashew and Almond Trail Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cranberry Cashew and Almond Trail Mix and Original balance multigrain cereal?

There is a difference of 119 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.