Cranberry walnut Chicken Salad vs Two-bite, coconut macaroons
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Cranberry walnut Chicken Salad
Two-bite, coconut macaroons
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Cranberry walnut Chicken Salad and Two-bite, coconut macaroons side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Cranberry walnut Chicken Salad is the clear winner. With 76 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Cranberry walnut Chicken Salad takes the lead with only 7.05g of sugar per 100g, whereas Two-bite, coconut macaroons contains 39.29g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Cranberry walnut Chicken Salad offers a protein boost with 15.3g per 100g, outperforming Two-bite, coconut macaroons in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Cranberry walnut Chicken Salad or Two-bite, coconut macaroons?
Cranberry walnut Chicken Salad appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Cranberry walnut Chicken Salad vegan?
No, Cranberry walnut Chicken Salad is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Cranberry walnut Chicken Salad and Two-bite, coconut macaroons?
There is a difference of 76 calories per 100g between the two products.
