Head-to-Head Analysis

Creamed Smoked Fish Roe vs Kitchen Classics Beef Barley Soup

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Creamed Smoked Fish Roe

Creamed Smoked Fish Roe

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kitchen Classics Beef Barley Soup

Kitchen Classics Beef Barley Soup

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
43.7 kcal
13.3g
Sugars
0g
33.3g
Fat
0.2g
6.7g
Protein
2.4g
6.2g
Salt
18.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Creamed Smoked Fish Roe and Kitchen Classics Beef Barley Soup side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Creamed Smoked Fish Roe is the more energy-dense option here, packing 356 more calories per 100g than Kitchen Classics Beef Barley Soup. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Creamed Smoked Fish Roe contains significantly more sugar (13.3g) compared to the milder Kitchen Classics Beef Barley Soup (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kitchen Classics Beef Barley Soup is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Creamed Smoked Fish Roe offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming Kitchen Classics Beef Barley Soup in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Creamed Smoked Fish Roe or Kitchen Classics Beef Barley Soup?

It depends on your goals. Creamed Smoked Fish Roe has 400 calories, while Kitchen Classics Beef Barley Soup has 43.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Creamed Smoked Fish Roe vegan?

No, Creamed Smoked Fish Roe is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Creamed Smoked Fish Roe and Kitchen Classics Beef Barley Soup?

There is a difference of 356 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.