Head-to-Head Analysis

Creamy almond butter vs Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Creamy almond butter

Creamy almond butter

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips

Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
656 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
6.3g
Sugars
3.6g
53.1g
Fat
32.1g
21.9g
Protein
7.1g
0.5g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Creamy almond butter and Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Creamy almond butter is the more energy-dense option here, packing 120 more calories per 100g than Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Creamy almond butter contains significantly more sugar (6.25g) compared to the milder Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips (3.5714285714286g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Creamy almond butter offers a protein boost with 21.9g per 100g, outperforming Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Creamy almond butter or Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Creamy almond butter has 656 calories, while Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Creamy almond butter vegan?

No, Creamy almond butter is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Creamy almond butter and Kettle cooked sea salt potato chips?

There is a difference of 120 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.