Head-to-Head Analysis

Creamy Balsamic vs Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Creamy Balsamic

Creamy Balsamic

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
1110 kcal
Energy
286 kcal
77.8g
Sugars
0g
88.9g
Fat
19g
0g
Protein
23.8g
0g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Creamy Balsamic and Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Creamy Balsamic is the more energy-dense option here, packing 824 more calories per 100g than Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Creamy Balsamic contains significantly more sugar (77.8g) compared to the milder Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Creamy Balsamic or Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese?

It depends on your goals. Creamy Balsamic has 1110 calories, while Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese has 286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Creamy Balsamic vegan?

No, Creamy Balsamic is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Creamy Balsamic and Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese?

There is a difference of 824 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.