Crinkle Cut Sweet Potato Sea Salt Root Chips vs Macrobar
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Crinkle Cut Sweet Potato Sea Salt Root Chips
Macrobar
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Crinkle Cut Sweet Potato Sea Salt Root Chips and Macrobar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Crinkle Cut Sweet Potato Sea Salt Root Chips is the clear winner. With 415 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Crinkle Cut Sweet Potato Sea Salt Root Chips takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Macrobar contains 10.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Crinkle Cut Sweet Potato Sea Salt Root Chips or Macrobar?
Crinkle Cut Sweet Potato Sea Salt Root Chips appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Crinkle Cut Sweet Potato Sea Salt Root Chips vegan?
No, Crinkle Cut Sweet Potato Sea Salt Root Chips is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Crinkle Cut Sweet Potato Sea Salt Root Chips and Macrobar?
There is a difference of 415 calories per 100g between the two products.
