Head-to-Head Analysis

Crispy Millet Chips (Spicy Flavor) vs Nabisco premium crackers-mini 1x11 oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Crispy Millet Chips (Spicy Flavor)

Crispy Millet Chips (Spicy Flavor)

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Nabisco premium crackers-mini 1x11 oz

Nabisco premium crackers-mini 1x11 oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
467 kcal
10g
Sugars
0g
24.3g
Fat
13.3g
8.6g
Protein
6.7g
1.4g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Crispy Millet Chips (Spicy Flavor) and Nabisco premium crackers-mini 1x11 oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Crispy Millet Chips (Spicy Flavor) is the more energy-dense option here, packing 33 more calories per 100g than Nabisco premium crackers-mini 1x11 oz. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Crispy Millet Chips (Spicy Flavor) contains significantly more sugar (10g) compared to the milder Nabisco premium crackers-mini 1x11 oz (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Nabisco premium crackers-mini 1x11 oz is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Crispy Millet Chips (Spicy Flavor) or Nabisco premium crackers-mini 1x11 oz?

It depends on your goals. Crispy Millet Chips (Spicy Flavor) has 500 calories, while Nabisco premium crackers-mini 1x11 oz has 467 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Crispy Millet Chips (Spicy Flavor) vegan?

No, Crispy Millet Chips (Spicy Flavor) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Crispy Millet Chips (Spicy Flavor) and Nabisco premium crackers-mini 1x11 oz?

There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.