Head-to-Head Analysis

Crunchy Coconut Shrimp With A Sweet Chili Sauce vs Basil Pesto

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Crunchy Coconut Shrimp With A Sweet Chili Sauce

Crunchy Coconut Shrimp With A Sweet Chili Sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Basil Pesto

Basil Pesto

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
229 kcal
Energy
350 kcal
15g
Sugars
0g
9.7g
Fat
36.7g
6.2g
Protein
3.3g
1.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Crunchy Coconut Shrimp With A Sweet Chili Sauce and Basil Pesto side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Crunchy Coconut Shrimp With A Sweet Chili Sauce is the clear winner. With 121 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Crunchy Coconut Shrimp With A Sweet Chili Sauce contains significantly more sugar (15g) compared to the milder Basil Pesto (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Basil Pesto is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Crunchy Coconut Shrimp With A Sweet Chili Sauce offers a protein boost with 6.17g per 100g, outperforming Basil Pesto in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Crunchy Coconut Shrimp With A Sweet Chili Sauce or Basil Pesto?

It depends on your goals. Crunchy Coconut Shrimp With A Sweet Chili Sauce has 229 calories, while Basil Pesto has 350 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Crunchy Coconut Shrimp With A Sweet Chili Sauce vegan?

No, Crunchy Coconut Shrimp With A Sweet Chili Sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Crunchy Coconut Shrimp With A Sweet Chili Sauce and Basil Pesto?

There is a difference of 121 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.